School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2005-06  

Published During 2006-07

The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. More information about SARC requirements is available at the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest, an online data tool at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/, contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state.

I. About This School
Contact Information
School District
 School Name  Spring Creek Elementary  District Name  Rincon Valley Union Elementary
 Street  4675 Mayette Ave.  Phone Number   (707) 542-7375
 City, State, Zip  Santa Rosa, CA    95405-7331  Web Site   www.rvusd.org
 Phone Number (707) 545-1771  Superintendent   Diane Moresi
 Principal   Randy Coleman  E-mail Address   dmoresi@rvusd.org
 E-mail Address   rcoleman@rvusd.org  ---  ---

School Description and Mission Statement
 Spring Creek Elementary School provides a safe, secure, and nurturing learning environment that emphasizes...
  • Confidence
  • High expectations
  • A strong connection with the home
  • Academic success
  • Technology as a tool for learning
  • Respect for self and others
  • The ability to work collaboratively within diverse groups
  • The application of learned concepts to everyday life 
    ....FOR ALL STUDENTS.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement
 There are many opportunities for parent involvement at Spring Creek. For information, call Randy Coleman at (707) 545-6926. 

Student Enrollment by Grade Level
This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.
 Grade Level  Number of Students
 Kindergarten 50 
 Grade 1 38 
 Grade 2 40 
 Grade 3 50 
 Grade 4 32 
 Grade 5 31 
 Grade 6 32 
 Total Enrollment 292 

Student Enrollment by Group
 Group  Percent of
Total Enrollment
 Group  Percent of
Total Enrollment
 African American 4.5   White (not Hispanic) 63.7 
 American Indian or Alaska Native 1.4   Multiple or No Response 0.0 
 Asian 8.2   Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 36.6 
 Filipino 0.0   English Learners 13.0 
 Hispanic or Latino 21.6   Students with Disabilities 25.0 
 Pacific Islander 0.7   ---  ---

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
 Grade
Level
 2003-04  2004-05  2005-06
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of
Classrooms
 1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+
 K  19.0  2      20.0  2      20.0  2    
 1  17.3  3      20.0  2      18.0  1    
 2  17.8  4      16.3  3      19.5  4    
 3  20.0  2      18.7  3      19.0  1    
 4  28.0    1    32.0    1    21.0  1  1  
 5          25.0    1          
 6  26.0    1    29.0    1    32.0    1  
 K-3                        
 3-4                  20.0  1    
 4-8  29.5    2    24.0    1    30.0    1  
 Other                        



Participation in the Class Size Reduction Program
This table displays the percent of students in kindergarten trough grade 3 who were assigned to a classroom that participated in the Class Size Reduction Program.
 Grade Level  Percent of Students Participating
 2003-04  2004-05  2005-06
 K   100%   100%   100%
 1   100%   100%   100%
 2   100%   100%   100%
 3   100%   100%   100%

II. School Climate

School Safety Plan
 The School Safety Plans are updated annually, and the last review was in the fall of 2006. The key elements of the plan include, (1) the School Mission, (2) a description of the School Climate, (3) a description of a Safe and Orderly Environment, and (4) the district’s SB 187-EC3529.4 Board Policies. Each of these areas is spelled out in detail in the plans. The plans are comprehensive and include both the legal requirements and the benefits of safety planning. 

School Discipline Practices
We are proud of Spring Creek’s students and our tradition of outstanding achievement. In order to maintain a positive, effective learning environment, we have developed this Discipline Plan. We invite your support for the plan and appreciate families who actively reinforce our efforts to promote positive behavior and character development. By working together for the students, we will help them grow socially, emotionally, and academically.

The goals of the plan are to provide each child:

• A safe, secure school
• An environment in which students and adults demonstrate respect
• Daily opportunities to develop positive character traits and appropriate behavior
• Classrooms where learning and teaching are both highly valued and consistently visible

Philosophy

Spring Creek is committed to excellence it its school programs. We believe that all students can behave appropriately at school. Students have a responsibility to behave in a manner which allows teachers to teach and students to learn.

Character Education

As stated in the RVUSD Mission Statement, our district is committed to “promoting positive character traits.” We believe that actively teaching appropriate behavior and encouraging the students to develop positive character traits are the best ways to create a quality school environment. Character Education activities are integrated into the daily routine of the school. Each year we select a theme, such as Respect or Responsibility, and build our program around it. We teach the students to demonstrate behavior that supports the theme and reinforce learning with classroom and school-wide activities, including writing, special recognition, and classroom discussions.

Spring Creek Code of Behavior

These are the fundamental principles guiding student behavior at school.

At Spring Creek Elementary School, we all:

1. Respect the physical safety of others. (Keep body and objects to self)
2. Use appropriate language at all times.
3. Respect and follow the directions of adults in charge.
4. Show respect for the school’s and others’ property.
5. Work without disrupting others.
6. Are responsible for our actions.


Suspensions and Expulsions
This table displays the rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at the school and district levels for the most recent three-year period.
 Rate  School  District
 2003-04  2004-05  2005-06  2003-04  2004-05  2005-06
 Suspensions 0.04  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.03  0.04 
 Expulsions

III. School Facilities

School Facility Conditions and Improvements
 The district takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and functional.

During the 2004-05 school year, local bond funds, Measure J, and state matching funds were used to modernize all schools with the exception of Austin Creek, which is six years old, and Village School, which was modernized in the late 1980’s. However, Village School received modernization of their multi-use facility and administrative wing.

All classrooms in the other five schools had new wall surfaces, paint, new lighting, cabinetry, new heating systems, upgraded electrical systems, window coverings, flooring, and marker boards. Each multi-use facility was completely modernized also. A new state of the art library media center and kindergarten complex were built. The administrative wing of each school was modernized to include small classrooms for special student programs, a staff room, and office and conference rooms.

District maintenance staff ensures that the prevention measures and repairs necessary to keep the school in good repair and working order are completed in a timely manner. A work order process is used to ensure efficient service and that emergency repairs and safety are given the highest priority.

Cleaning: Cleaning standards have been adopted for all schools in the district. The Maintenance and Operations supervisor meets regularly with the custodial staff and visits sites regularly to ensure the cleaning standards are being upheld. In addition, the principal works daily with the custodial staff to ensure a clean and safe school.

Deferred Maintenance: The district participates in the State School Deferred Maintenance Program, which provides state matching funds on a dollar-for-dollar basis, to assist school districts with expenditures for major repair or replacement of existing school building components. Typically, this includes roofing, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, interior or exterior painting, and floor systems. For the 2006-07 school year, the district budgeted $502,000 for the deferred maintenance program. The state gives the district $107,672, and the district contribution is $110,005 by state formula. This represents 1/2 of 1% of the district’s general fund budget.


School Facility Conditions Good Repair Status
A thorough inspection of the facility was completed on February 26, 2007.
 Item Inspected
 Facility in
Good Repair
 Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned
 Yes  No
 Gas Leaks
X 
   
 Mechanical Systems
X 
   
 Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior)
X 
   
 Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings)
X 
   
 Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior)
X 
   
 Structural Damage
X 
   
 Fire Safety
X 
   
 Electrical (interior and exterior)
X 
   
 Pest/Vermin Infestation
X 
   
 Drinking Fountains (inside and outside)
X 
   
 Restrooms
X 
   
 Sewer
X 
   
 Playground/School Grounds
X 
   
Roof
X 
   
Overall Cleanliness
X 
   

IV. Teachers

Teacher Credentials
Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
 Teachers  School  District
   2003-04      2004-05      2005-06      2005-06  
 With Full Credential  17  17  16  166
 Without Full Credential  1  1  1  2

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
 Indicator    2004-05      2005-06      2006-07  
 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners  0  0  0
 Total Teacher Misassignments  0  0  0
 Vacant Teacher Positions  0  0  0

Core Academic Classes Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
 Location of Classes  Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
 Taught by
 NCLB Compliant Teachers
 Taught by
 Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers
 This School   92.9  7.1
 All Schools in District   80.0  20.0
 High-Poverty Schools in District   0.0  0.0
 Low-Poverty Schools in District   72.0  28.0

Substitute Teacher Availability
The district and school maintain lists of credentialed teachers and the areas in which they are qualified to teach. We have had a sufficient number of substitute teachers with the necessary special qualifications to maintain continuity of instruction.

Teacher Evaluation Process
Teachers are evaluated on a regular basis, according to a process outlined in the negotiated contract. The evaluation is based on the California State Teaching Standards. Administrators and teachers agree on yearly objectives and review them to determine levels of teacher performance. Spring Creek School completed 100% of required evaluations according to contract timelines. 

V. Support Staff

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff
This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
 Title  Number of FTE
 Assigned to School
 Average Number of
 Students per
 Academic Counselor
 Academic Counselor
0
 0
 Library Media Teacher (Librarian)
 0
 ---
 Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional)
 .4375
 ---
 Psychologist
 .22
 ---
 Social Worker
0
 ---
 Nurse
 .177
 ---
 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist
 .444
 ---
 Resource Specialist (non-teaching)
 .3125
 ---
 Science Facilitator
.1250
 ---
 Computer Technician
.3038
 ---
 Other Paraeducators
 1.305
 ---

VI. Curriculum and Instructional Materials

Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
 Core Curriculum Area  Quality, Currency, and
 Availability of Textbooks and
 Instructional Materials
 Percent of Pupils
 Who Lack Their Own
 Assigned Textbooks and
 Instructional Materials
 Reading/Language Arts   According to the survey made in March, 2007, sufficient textbooks were available for each student in all core curriculum areas.         
  0% 
 Mathematics
 Science
 History-Social Science
 Health


VII. School Finances

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.

Note: this table will be completed as soon as the information is available.

 Level  Total
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 (Supplemental)
 Expenditures
 Per Pupil
 (Basic)
 Average
 Teacher
 Salary
 School Site        
 District  ---  ---     $0
 Percent Difference - School Site and District  ---  ---    
 State  ---  ---  $4,743  $56,471
 Percent Difference - School Site and State  ---  ---    

Types of Services Funded
Teaching and support staffs, books and materials, special education, transportation, food services, maintenance and operations, after-school programs and childcare.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0405.asp.
 Category  District
 Amount
 State Average
 For Districts
 In Same Category
 Beginning Teacher Salary
$39,110
 $37,797
 Mid-Range Teacher Salary
 $53.432
 $57,601
 Highest Teacher Salary
 $67,638
 $71,233
 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)
 $87,989
 $88,676
 Superintendent Salary
 $122,023
 $127,179
 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries
 42.7
 42.1
 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries
 6.3
 5.8

VIII. Student Performance

California Standards Tests
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs include English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2 through 11; science in grades 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding CST results for each grade and proficiency level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST Results for All Students -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
 Subject  School  District  State
 2004  2005  2006  2004  2005  2006  2004  2005  2006
 English-Language Arts  60  59  55  64  68  69  36  40  42
 Mathematics  58  63  62  65  72  73  34  38  40
 Science  67  46  55  50  56  54  25  27  35

CST Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards) for the most recent testing period.
 Group  Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
 English-
Language Arts
 Mathematics  Science  History-
Social Science
 African American  *  *  *  
 American Indian or Alaska Native  *  *  *  
 Asian  79  93    
 Filipino        
 Hispanic or Latino  47  60  *  
 Pacific Islander        
 White (Not Hispanic)  61  65  64  
 Male  55  67  57  
 Female  59  57  53  
 Economically Disadvantaged  46  54  *  
 English Learners  30  52    
 Students with Disabilities  27  47  *  
 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services  *  *    

Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
The norm-referenced test (NRT), currently the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT/6), shows how well students are doing compared to students nationally in reading, language, spelling, and mathematics in grades 3 and 7 only. The results are reported as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile). Detailed information regarding NRT results for each grade level can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT Results for All Students -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics.
Subject  School  District  State
 2004  2005  2006  2004  2005  2006  2004  2005  2006
 Reading  57  50  32  67  68  61  43  41  42
 Mathematics  72  62  52  75  77  74  51  52  53

NRT Results by Student Group -- Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics for the most recent testing period.
Group  Percent of Students Scoring at or
Above the National Average
 Reading  Mathematics
 African American  *  *
 American Indian or Alaska Native  *  *
 Asian  *  *
 Filipino    
 Hispanic or Latino  18  27
 Pacific Islander    
 White (not Hispanic)  29  56
 Male  32  45
 Female  33  75
 Economically Disadvantaged  26  47
 English Learners  *  *
 Students with Disabilities  13  27
 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services    

California Physical Fitness Test Results
The California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades 5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards) for the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test, and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state levels, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
 Grade Level  Percent of
Students Meeting
Fitness Standards
 5
 26.7

IX. Accountability

Academic Performance Index

The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information about the API can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.

API Ranks -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched "similar schools." A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school's academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school's academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
 API Rank  2003-04  2004-05  2005-06
 Statewide  8  9  8
 Similar Schools  6  9  7

API Changes by Student Group -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
 Group  Actual API Change  API Score
 2003-04  2004-05  2005-06  2006
 All Students at the School  17  -19  -18  797
 African American        
 American Indian or Alaska Native        
 Asian        
 Filipino        
 Hispanic or Latino        
 Pacific Islander        
 White (not Hispanic)  -4  -14  -18  812
 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged  58  -28  -28  745
 English Learners  --  --    
 Students with Disabilities  --  --    

State Award and Intervention Programs
Spring Creek School is not a participant in any state intervention and award program.

Adequate Yearly Progress
The federal NCLB act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria: Detailed information about AYP, including participation rates and percent proficient results by student group, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.

AYP Overall and by Criteria
This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria.
 AYP Criteria  School  District
 Overall  No  Yes
 Participation Rate - English-Language Arts  No  Yes
 Participation Rate - Mathematics  Yes  Yes
 Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts  Yes  Yes
 Percent Proficient - Mathematics  Yes  Yes
 API  Yes  Yes

Federal Intervention Program
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.
 Indicator     School        District   
 Program Improvement Status   Not in PI  Not In PI
 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement   ---  0
 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement   ---  0.0


X. Instructional Planning and Scheduling

School Instruction and Leadership
 The Rincon Valley Union School District has exceptional school leadership. All the school administrators have a minimum of 15 years experience with the exception of one principal who has 7 years of experience. Two of the principals hold Doctorates in Educational leadership. The senior school administrator has been in the district for 20 years. These individuals provide high quality leadership at their school sites.

The administrator at each school meets formally with parents and teachers monthly in the School Site Council. This decision-making body collaboratively sets goals for the school on an annual basis, allocates money from the budget to meet their goals, and assesses their progress at the beginning of each year when achievement data is available. The Single Site Plan is reviewed and modified based on the data review. New goals are added or modified as necessary to meet the needs of all students.

The instructional mission of the school is standards-based. Instructional materials are state adopted. Materials are evaluated by teacher committees before purchase. Staff development for the teachers is both locally focused and district-wide.

Supports and services are provided to meet the students' special needs.

GATE – Gifted and Talented Education – students are identified for services both within the regular classroom and by supplemental classes. At-risk students receive academic support through tutoring programs, intersession school, and summer school. English language learners are taught by a classroom teacher trained in instructional strategies to meet the students individual needs. In addition, English language instructional assistants work with students and their families.
Students with disabilities receive services from a resource teacher, speech and language therapist, adaptive physical education teacher, etc. Student placement and services are identified in the student’s IEP – Individualized Educational Plan. Tutoring is provided before and after school at most school sites. The focus is the mastery of district and state standards.

Assessment of student progress is measured in many ways. The district administers a Benchmark Standards Assessment in January and the Standards Assessment in May. Students are assessed every 6-8 weeks by the classroom teacher in reading and language arts. The SAM – Standards Assessment in Mathematics – is administered in the fall and again in the spring. All state mandated tests are given annually.


Professional Development
On-going professional development is supported by the Peer Assistance and Review Consulting teacher and the District Language Arts Consulting teacher. These teachers provide demonstration lessons, on-going curriculum development classes, and training. The district has 5 full days of staff development for all teachers. All beginning teachers are supported through the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) offered through the Sonoma County Office of Education.

Instructional Minutes
 Grade
Level
 Instructional Minutes
 Offered  State Requirement
 K
 50,820
 36,000
 1
 51,954
 50,400
 2
 51,954
 50,400
 3
 51,954
 50,400
 4
 54,175
 54,000
 5
  54,175
 54,000
 6
  54,175
 54,000


Minimum Days in School Year
There were seven minimum days during the 2005-2006 school year that were used for Parent-Teacher Conferences and for the final day of school.