School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2005-06 Published During 2006-07 |
| The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. More information about SARC requirements is available at the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest, an online data tool at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/, contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. |
I. About This School
Contact Information
| School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| School Name | Spring Creek Elementary | District Name | Rincon Valley Union Elementary |
| Street | 4675 Mayette Ave. | Phone Number | (707) 542-7375 |
| City, State, Zip | Santa Rosa, CA 95405-7331 | Web Site | www.rvusd.org |
| Phone Number | (707) 545-1771 | Superintendent | Diane Moresi |
| Principal | Randy Coleman | E-mail Address | dmoresi@rvusd.org |
| E-mail Address | rcoleman@rvusd.org | --- | --- |
School Description and Mission Statement
Spring
Creek Elementary School provides a safe, secure, and nurturing learning
environment that emphasizes...
|
Opportunities for Parental Involvement
| There are many opportunities for parent involvement at Spring Creek. For information, call Randy Coleman at (707) 545-6926. |
Student Enrollment by Grade Level
This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.
| Grade Level | Number of Students |
|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 50 |
| Grade 1 | 38 |
| Grade 2 | 40 |
| Grade 3 | 50 |
| Grade 4 | 32 |
| Grade 5 | 31 |
| Grade 6 | 32 |
| Total Enrollment | 292 |
Student Enrollment by Group
| Group | Percent of Total Enrollment |
Group | Percent of Total Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|
| African American | 4.5 | White (not Hispanic) | 63.7 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 1.4 | Multiple or No Response | 0.0 |
| Asian | 8.2 | Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 36.6 |
| Filipino | 0.0 | English Learners | 13.0 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 21.6 | Students with Disabilities | 25.0 |
| Pacific Islander | 0.7 | --- | --- |
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
| Grade Level |
2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Class Size |
Number
of Classrooms |
Avg. Class Size |
Number
of Classrooms |
Avg. Class Size |
Number
of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| K | 19.0 | 2 | 20.0 | 2 | 20.0 | 2 | ||||||
| 1 | 17.3 | 3 | 20.0 | 2 | 18.0 | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 17.8 | 4 | 16.3 | 3 | 19.5 | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | 20.0 | 2 | 18.7 | 3 | 19.0 | 1 | ||||||
| 4 | 28.0 | 1 | 32.0 | 1 | 21.0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 25.0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 6 | 26.0 | 1 | 29.0 | 1 | 32.0 | 1 | ||||||
| K-3 | ||||||||||||
| 3-4 | 20.0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 4-8 | 29.5 | 2 | 24.0 | 1 | 30.0 | 1 | ||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
Participation in the Class Size Reduction Program
This table displays the percent of students in kindergarten trough grade 3 who were assigned to a classroom that participated in the Class Size Reduction Program.
| Grade Level | Percent of Students Participating | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| K | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
II. School Climate
School Safety Plan
| The School Safety Plans are updated annually, and the last review was in the fall of 2006. The key elements of the plan include, (1) the School Mission, (2) a description of the School Climate, (3) a description of a Safe and Orderly Environment, and (4) the district’s SB 187-EC3529.4 Board Policies. Each of these areas is spelled out in detail in the plans. The plans are comprehensive and include both the legal requirements and the benefits of safety planning. |
School Discipline Practices
| We are proud of Spring
Creek’s students and our tradition of outstanding achievement.
In order to maintain a positive, effective learning environment, we
have developed this Discipline Plan. We invite your support for the
plan and appreciate families who actively reinforce our efforts to promote
positive behavior and character development. By working together for
the students, we will help them grow socially, emotionally, and academically.
The goals of the plan are to provide each child:
Philosophy Spring Creek is committed to excellence it its school programs. We believe that all students can behave appropriately at school. Students have a responsibility to behave in a manner which allows teachers to teach and students to learn. Character Education As stated in the RVUSD Mission Statement, our district is committed to “promoting positive character traits.” We believe that actively teaching appropriate behavior and encouraging the students to develop positive character traits are the best ways to create a quality school environment. Character Education activities are integrated into the daily routine of the school. Each year we select a theme, such as Respect or Responsibility, and build our program around it. We teach the students to demonstrate behavior that supports the theme and reinforce learning with classroom and school-wide activities, including writing, special recognition, and classroom discussions. Spring Creek Code of Behavior These are the fundamental principles guiding student behavior at school.
|
Suspensions and Expulsions
This table displays the rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at the school and district levels for the most recent three-year period.
| Rate | School | District | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| Suspensions | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Expulsions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
III. School Facilities
School Facility Conditions and Improvements
| The district takes great efforts to ensure
that all schools are clean, safe, and functional.
During the 2004-05 school year, local bond funds, Measure J, and state matching funds were used to modernize all schools with the exception of Austin Creek, which is six years old, and Village School, which was modernized in the late 1980’s. However, Village School received modernization of their multi-use facility and administrative wing. All classrooms in the other five schools had new wall surfaces, paint, new lighting, cabinetry, new heating systems, upgraded electrical systems, window coverings, flooring, and marker boards. Each multi-use facility was completely modernized also. A new state of the art library media center and kindergarten complex were built. The administrative wing of each school was modernized to include small classrooms for special student programs, a staff room, and office and conference rooms. District maintenance staff ensures that the prevention measures and repairs necessary to keep the school in good repair and working order are completed in a timely manner. A work order process is used to ensure efficient service and that emergency repairs and safety are given the highest priority. Cleaning: Cleaning standards have been adopted for all schools in the district. The Maintenance and Operations supervisor meets regularly with the custodial staff and visits sites regularly to ensure the cleaning standards are being upheld. In addition, the principal works daily with the custodial staff to ensure a clean and safe school. Deferred Maintenance: The district participates in the State School Deferred Maintenance Program, which provides state matching funds on a dollar-for-dollar basis, to assist school districts with expenditures for major repair or replacement of existing school building components. Typically, this includes roofing, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, electrical systems, interior or exterior painting, and floor systems. For the 2006-07 school year, the district budgeted $502,000 for the deferred maintenance program. The state gives the district $107,672, and the district contribution is $110,005 by state formula. This represents 1/2 of 1% of the district’s general fund budget. |
School Facility Conditions Good Repair Status
A thorough inspection of the facility was completed on February 26, 2007.
| Item Inspected |
Facility in Good Repair |
Repair Needed
and Action Taken or Planned |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| Gas Leaks | X
|
||
| Mechanical Systems | X
|
||
| Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior) | X
|
||
| Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings) | X
|
||
| Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior) | X
|
||
| Structural Damage | X
|
||
| Fire Safety | X
|
||
| Electrical (interior and exterior) | X
|
||
| Pest/Vermin Infestation | X
|
||
| Drinking Fountains (inside and outside) | X
|
||
| Restrooms | X
|
||
| Sewer | X
|
||
| Playground/School Grounds | X
|
||
| Roof | X |
||
| Overall Cleanliness | X |
||
IV. Teachers
Teacher Credentials
Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Teachers | School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2005-06 | |
| With Full Credential | 17 | 17 | 16 | 166 |
| Without Full Credential | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
| Indicator | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Teacher Misassignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vacant Teacher Positions | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Core Academic Classes Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
| Location of Classes | Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects | |
|---|---|---|
| Taught
by NCLB Compliant Teachers |
Taught
by Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers | |
| This School | 92.9 | 7.1 |
| All Schools in District | 80.0 | 20.0 |
| High-Poverty Schools in District | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Low-Poverty Schools in District | 72.0 | 28.0 |
Substitute Teacher Availability
| The district and school maintain lists of credentialed teachers and the areas in which they are qualified to teach. We have had a sufficient number of substitute teachers with the necessary special qualifications to maintain continuity of instruction. |
Teacher Evaluation Process
| Teachers are evaluated on a regular basis, according to a process outlined in the negotiated contract. The evaluation is based on the California State Teaching Standards. Administrators and teachers agree on yearly objectives and review them to determine levels of teacher performance. Spring Creek School completed 100% of required evaluations according to contract timelines. |
V. Support Staff
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff
This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
| Title | Number of FTE Assigned to School |
Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Counselor | 0 |
0 |
| Library Media Teacher (Librarian) | 0 |
--- |
| Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) | .4375 |
--- |
| Psychologist | .22 |
--- |
| Social Worker | 0 |
--- |
| Nurse | .177 |
--- |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist | .444 |
--- |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) | .3125 |
--- |
| Science Facilitator | .1250 |
--- |
| Computer Technician | .3038 |
--- |
| Other Paraeducators | 1.305 |
--- |
VI. Curriculum and Instructional Materials
Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
| Core Curriculum Area | Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
Percent of Pupils Who Lack Their Own Assigned Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reading/Language Arts | According to the survey made in March, 2007, sufficient textbooks were available for each student in all core curriculum areas. |
0%
|
| Mathematics | ||
| Science | ||
| History-Social Science | ||
| Health |
VII. School Finances
Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year
2004-05)
Detailed information regarding salaries can be found
at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/ and
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.
Note: this table will be completed as soon as the information is available.
| Level | Total Expenditures Per Pupil |
Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental) |
Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic) |
Average Teacher Salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Site | ||||
| District | --- | --- | $0 | |
| Percent Difference - School Site and District | --- | --- | ||
| State | --- | --- | $4,743 | $56,471 |
| Percent Difference - School Site and State | --- | --- |
Types of Services Funded
| Teaching and support staffs, books and materials, special education, transportation, food services, maintenance and operations, after-school programs and childcare. |
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0405.asp.
| Category | District Amount |
State Average For Districts In Same Category |
|---|---|---|
| Beginning Teacher Salary | $39,110 |
$37,797 |
| Mid-Range Teacher Salary | $53.432 |
$57,601 |
| Highest Teacher Salary | $67,638 |
$71,233 |
| Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | $87,989 |
$88,676 |
| Superintendent Salary | $122,023 |
$127,179 |
| Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 42.7 |
42.1 |
| Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 6.3 |
5.8 |
VIII. Student Performance
California Standards Tests
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs include English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2 through 11; science in grades 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding CST results for each grade and proficiency level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
CST Results for All Students -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| English-Language Arts | 60 | 59 | 55 | 64 | 68 | 69 | 36 | 40 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 58 | 63 | 62 | 65 | 72 | 73 | 34 | 38 | 40 |
| Science | 67 | 46 | 55 | 50 | 56 | 54 | 25 | 27 | 35 |
CST Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards) for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English- Language Arts |
Mathematics | Science | History- Social Science | |
| African American | * | * | * | |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | * | * | * | |
| Asian | 79 | 93 | ||
| Filipino | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | 47 | 60 | * | |
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (Not Hispanic) | 61 | 65 | 64 | |
| Male | 55 | 67 | 57 | |
| Female | 59 | 57 | 53 | |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 46 | 54 | * | |
| English Learners | 30 | 52 | ||
| Students with Disabilities | 27 | 47 | * | |
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | * | * | ||
Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
The norm-referenced test (NRT), currently the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT/6), shows how well students are doing compared to students nationally in reading, language, spelling, and mathematics in grades 3 and 7 only. The results are reported as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile). Detailed information regarding NRT results for each grade level can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
NRT Results for All Students -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics.
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| Reading | 57 | 50 | 32 | 67 | 68 | 61 | 43 | 41 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 72 | 62 | 52 | 75 | 77 | 74 | 51 | 52 | 53 |
NRT Results by Student Group -- Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at or Above the National Average | |
|---|---|---|
| Reading | Mathematics | |
| African American | * | * |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | * | * |
| Asian | * | * |
| Filipino | ||
| Hispanic or Latino | 18 | 27 |
| Pacific Islander | ||
| White (not Hispanic) | 29 | 56 |
| Male | 32 | 45 |
| Female | 33 | 75 |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 26 | 47 |
| English Learners | * | * |
| Students with Disabilities | 13 | 27 |
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | ||
California Physical Fitness Test Results
The California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades 5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards) for the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test, and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state levels, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
| Grade Level | Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards |
|---|---|
5 |
26.7 |
IX. Accountability
Academic Performance Index
The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information about the API can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.
API Ranks -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched "similar schools." A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school's academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school's academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
| API Rank | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statewide | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| Similar Schools | 6 | 9 | 7 |
API Changes by Student Group -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
| Group | Actual API Change | API Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006 | |
| All Students at the School | 17 | -19 | -18 | 797 |
| African American | ||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | ||||
| Asian | ||||
| Filipino | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | ||||
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (not Hispanic) | -4 | -14 | -18 | 812 |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 58 | -28 | -28 | 745 |
| English Learners | -- | -- | ||
| Students with Disabilities | -- | -- | ||
State Award and Intervention Programs
| Spring Creek School is not a participant in any state intervention and award program. |
Adequate Yearly Progress
The federal NCLB act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:
- Participation rate on the state's standards-based assessments in English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics
- Percent proficient on the state's standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics
- API as an additional indicator
- Graduation rate (for secondary schools)
AYP Overall and by Criteria
This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria.
| AYP Criteria | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | No | Yes |
| Participation Rate - English-Language Arts | No | Yes |
| Participation Rate - Mathematics | Yes | Yes |
| Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts | Yes | Yes |
| Percent Proficient - Mathematics | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
Federal Intervention Program
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.
| Indicator | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Program Improvement Status | Not in PI | Not In PI |
| Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 0 |
| Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 0.0 |
X. Instructional Planning and Scheduling
School Instruction and Leadership
| The
Rincon Valley Union School District has exceptional school leadership.
All the school administrators have a minimum of 15 years experience
with the exception of one principal who has 7 years of experience. Two
of the principals hold Doctorates in Educational leadership. The senior
school administrator has been in the district for 20 years. These individuals
provide high quality leadership at their school sites. The administrator at each school meets formally with parents and teachers monthly in the School Site Council. This decision-making body collaboratively sets goals for the school on an annual basis, allocates money from the budget to meet their goals, and assesses their progress at the beginning of each year when achievement data is available. The Single Site Plan is reviewed and modified based on the data review. New goals are added or modified as necessary to meet the needs of all students. The instructional mission of the school is standards-based. Instructional materials are state adopted. Materials are evaluated by teacher committees before purchase. Staff development for the teachers is both locally focused and district-wide. Supports and services are provided to meet the students' special needs. GATE – Gifted
and Talented Education – students are identified for services
both within the regular classroom and by supplemental classes. At-risk
students receive academic support through tutoring programs, intersession
school, and summer school. English language learners are taught by
a classroom teacher trained in instructional strategies to meet the
students individual needs. In addition, English language instructional
assistants work with students and their families. Assessment of student progress is measured in many ways. The district administers a Benchmark Standards Assessment in January and the Standards Assessment in May. Students are assessed every 6-8 weeks by the classroom teacher in reading and language arts. The SAM – Standards Assessment in Mathematics – is administered in the fall and again in the spring. All state mandated tests are given annually. |
Professional Development
| On-going professional development is supported by the Peer Assistance and Review Consulting teacher and the District Language Arts Consulting teacher. These teachers provide demonstration lessons, on-going curriculum development classes, and training. The district has 5 full days of staff development for all teachers. All beginning teachers are supported through the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) offered through the Sonoma County Office of Education. |
Instructional Minutes
| Grade Level |
Instructional Minutes | |
|---|---|---|
| Offered | State Requirement | |
| K | 50,820 |
36,000 |
| 1 | 51,954 |
50,400 |
| 2 | 51,954 |
50,400 |
| 3 | 51,954 |
50,400 |
| 4 | 54,175 |
54,000 |
| 5 | 54,175 |
54,000 |
| 6 | 54,175 |
54,000 |
Minimum Days in School Year
| There were seven minimum days during the 2005-2006 school year that were used for Parent-Teacher Conferences and for the final day of school. |